Is it Art? | "Invisible Sculpture" by Salvatore Garau

Italian artists are really something else! 

The latest to grab art world headlines was Salvatore Garau and his "Invisible Sculpture", which sold for £13,000 ($18,300) at auction in May. Conceptual Art is often a hard pill to swallow, but this one might have just broken the record. This art piece is literally made out of nothing, and its original title is "Io Sono" ("I am" in English). The artist has many other "invisible sculptures'' that he displays in different locations. “But what is it really?” - you might be wondering. Garau duct tapes a square/circle on the floor, and that's it! Nothing else. 

The artist explains that his conceptual works are based on the energy of nothingness - "You do not see it but it exists. It is made of air and spirit."

Also, Garau claims that his pieces are for eternity, as in, even if you remove the tape, that sculpture can't be removed from that space. This appears similar to how many people describe the omnipresence of God.

Garau is not the first Italian artist to shake the art world with their unconventional Art. If you remember, Maurizio Cattelan also stirred a frenzy with his duck taped banana a couple of years ago, which sold for an impressive $120,000 at Art Basel Miami. Or even Piero Manzoni's ninety cans of Artist's Shit created back in 1961. These artworks are quite literal. And yes, Manzoni canned his own poop! The most impressive thing is the explanation these artists were able to create behind such a banal thing. Manzoni said, "if collectors want something intimate, really personal to the artist, there's the artist's own shit, that is really his.” (Letter reprinted in Battino and Palazzoli p.144.). 

The conceptual art journey from Manzoni's work to Garau's "Invisible Sculpture" follows a clear line that  puts a big question mark on the objectification of Art. Manzoni, like Duchamp, questions the value of art: anything can be art, even your excrements. But that need to associate art with an object has been decreasing. As we become more and more digitised, the need to hold a physical thing is vanishing, and art can exist in a digital space or not exist at all and still be an “object” of admiration (and yes it can still be an emoji poop!). In this sense, "Invisible Sculptures" from Salvatore Garau brings us back to the conversation of NFTs, and reflecting on the value of digital, or nonphysical, art. Garau is even more radical as a concept than what underlies NFTs but what is interesting is how we are slowly accepting radicality, questioning less why something is valuable or not - a stream that started with Dada and Duchamp, and in particular his “Fountain”, and now here we are. 

Maybe, these are questions that artists like Garau are proposing us. Maybe “Invisible Sculpture” is worth 13k. Maybe not.

What is more valuable: the concept or the thing? Would you buy nothingness?


? #NFTs #DADA #Duchamp 

1 1 5 0 0 0
Replies (19)
  • I find this so interesting.. definitely gave me a good reason to procrastinate while working from home! 

    I'm struggling to decide on whether an invisible sculpture can be art or not. I love the reasoning behind it and the idea, and the simple fact that the artist said it cannot be moved from it's original place even with the tape removed.

    However, to me I don't think I can class this as art. Art to me is something to view and making me feel a certain way, and even though he has portrayed a way of feeling about this piece of 'art', there is nothing for me to view. 

    So, love the idea and the question but there is nothing to see! 

    0 0 0 0 0 0
    • That’s so interesting about the Mona Lisa, I’d never even though of how the two link but now you’ve pointed it out it’s so obvious! And art is often about the context and the space in time when the piece was created and the story behind it always holds more value than the piece as it exists currently. Going off from that I can’t help but be reminded of Rauschenberg’s Erased de Kooning and how the absence of the art is what makes it so special, thank you for showing this perspective!

      0 0 0 0 0 0
      • what do you mean? how is Mona Lisa famous for what you don't see? I think comparison is a bit extreme . I would love to understand your point of view on this

        0 0 0 0 0 0
        • Erased de Kooning is completely different. It is an act of destruction; an act of overposing to the master- it is an act of defiance . I don't think it has to do with the aura that surrounds it. Mona Lisa has an aura - but what makes it so famous is not just its aura. For Salvatore garau, he is only selling us the aura, the sublime of art. I mean, this is kinda extreme . ALL art has an aura. I don't agree with this comparison 

          0 0 0 0 0 0
        • I find this so interesting.. definitely gave me a good reason to procrastinate while working from home! 

          I'm struggling to decide on whether an invisible sculpture can be art or not. I love the reasoning behind it and the idea, and the simple fact that the artist said it cannot be moved from it's original place even with the tape removed.

          However, to me I don't think I can class this as art. Art to me is something to view and making me feel a certain way, and even though he has portrayed a way of feeling about this piece of 'art', there is nothing for me to view. 

          So, love the idea and the question but there is nothing to see! 

          0 0 0 0 0 0
          • That’s so interesting about the Mona Lisa, I’d never even though of how the two link but now you’ve pointed it out it’s so obvious! And art is often about the context and the space in time when the piece was created and the story behind it always holds more value than the piece as it exists currently. Going off from that I can’t help but be reminded of Rauschenberg’s Erased de Kooning and how the absence of the art is what makes it so special, thank you for showing this perspective!

            0 0 0 0 0 0
            • what do you mean? how is Mona Lisa famous for what you don't see? I think comparison is a bit extreme . I would love to understand your point of view on this

              0 0 0 0 0 0
              • Erased de Kooning is completely different. It is an act of destruction; an act of overposing to the master- it is an act of defiance . I don't think it has to do with the aura that surrounds it. Mona Lisa has an aura - but what makes it so famous is not just its aura. For Salvatore garau, he is only selling us the aura, the sublime of art. I mean, this is kinda extreme . ALL art has an aura. I don't agree with this comparison 

                0 0 0 0 0 0
              • I mean, how the hell is this art ? The artworld is lost ... really questioning the sanity of the person that bought it! art these days ... Philip Morgan do you agree?

                0 0 0 0 0 0
                • I see your point. But if he can sell it on, then is he really so insane? I mean people spend thousands on pieces of compressed carbon that have value because we assign value to it. 

                  0 0 0 0 0 0
                • Amazing, I find it amusing how Cattelan, Manzoni and Garau just took things in their literal sense laughing! I think many people are wondering whether Piero Manzoni work actually contains his defecation and that's the 'charm' of it, isn't it? 

                  0 0 0 0 0 0
                  • Charm and defecation in the same sentence, where the first is referred to the latter... only on an art discussion can happen huahuah laughing

                    0 0 0 0 0 0
                  • Thanks for sharing this Artscapy ! Speaking of NFTs, I am wondering if his invisible sculpture will be turned into an NFT one daysurprised

                    0 0 0 0 0 0
                    • Ah! this is such a good point!!!! Do you think ? surprised probably ... thou it wouldn't be much different from what it is already - a COA ... 

                      0 0 0 0 0 0
                    • I think this was just a way to make a point and not to create an actual piece of art. I see the philosophical/artistic questions about the sculpture existing in its 'own' space, from its 'own' energy, but from a scientific perspective, this makes absolutely no sense... 

                      0 0 0 0 0 0
                      • this other guy is just suing Salvatore Garau and its hilarious! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tP1fwjsWutg&t=410s 

                        0 0 0 0 0 0
                        • Really torn on this. On the one hand, if the value of these (what some people might call) "stunts" is to stimulate discussion about "What is Art" then I feel the market is truly saturated. We're stimulated. The banana really set us straight and we will be discussing "What is Art" until the end of time. Let's move on. On the OTHER hand, I am utterly captivated by John Cage's 4'33 in ways that I just can't explain. Why is this patch of earth bounded by the most basic of DIY products any different? 

                          0 0 0 0 0 0
                          • IMO is the ability to break/move the prevalent thinking that make art. That is what 4’33” did, and that’s why when you see it executed is breathtaking…

                            0 0 0 0 0 0

                          Oh no!

                          To see this content you need to be logged in, so go ahead and log in to get back to your art.

                          Login

                          Artscapy

                          Close